October 16, 2017

A Thought about 'Green Energy' Poverty

"For industrialized nations, “green energy poverty” refers to households in which 10% or more of family incomes is spent on household energy costs – due to policies that compel utilities to provide ever increasing amounts of expensive, less affordable, politically preferred “green” energy. It’s a regressive tax that disproportionately affects low and fixed income families which have little money to spend beyond energy, food, clothing, rent and other basic needs. Every energy price increase hammers them harder.

"Beyond our borders, the concept underscores the lot of families that enjoy none of the living standards we take for granted. They have no electricity or get it a few hours a week at random times, burn wood and dung for cooking and heating, and spend hours every day collecting fuel and hauling filthy water from miles away. Corrupt, incompetent governments and constant pressure from callous environmentalist pressure groups in rich countries perpetuate the misery, joblessness, disease, starvation and early death.

"In the United States, green energy policies affect the poorest households three times more than the richest households. In fact, rising electricity prices affect all goods and services, for all electricity users: homes, offices, hospitals, schools, malls, farms and factories. With 37 million American families earning less than $24,000 per year after taxes, and 22 million households taking home less than $16,000 post-tax, it’s pretty obvious why wind and solar mandates are unfair, unsustainable and inhumane."

~ Paul Driessen

HT his April 22, 2017 Townhall column, "Green Energy Poverty Week."

October 15, 2017

A Thought about Social Media

"Social media -- a permanent marinade for the human brain -- is causing a vast, mysterious transformation of how people process experience, and maybe someday a future B.F. Skinner will explain what it has done to us."

~ Daniel Henninger

Source: his June 15, 2017 Wonderland column (behind paywall), "Political Disorder Syndrome," page A15, Wall Street Journal.

October 14, 2017

Chicago Repeals Its Soda Tax

At the National Taxpayers Union's blog on Thursday, Tom Aiello reported that Cook County (Chicago and inner suburbs) realized their mistake and repealed their soda tax after just 71 days.

He went on to explain:

"Yesterday, the Cook County Board of Commissioners voted to repeal the disastrous sweetened beverage tax. After going into effect back in August, the tax has united 87 percent of residents in opposition due to its adverse economic impacts. With a super majority voting in favor of repeal, shoppers and businesses will no longer have to bear the burden of the penny-per-ounce tax starting December 1st.

"In addition to the county’s sweetened beverage tax, Chicagoans already pay a 3 percent tax on soft drinks. Adding both on top of Chicago’s sales tax rate of 10.25 percent (the highest of any major city), soda sold in the city is among the most expensive in the country. According to research from the Illinois Policy Institute, “a two-liter bottle of pop with a base price of $2.49 now costs $3.49, an effective 40 percent combined tax rate on soda.” In fact, the county’s tax on sweetened beverages is more than five times higher than Illinois’ state tax on beer and alcohol.

"When consumers are faced with higher prices on goods, they will end up reducing their purchase quantity. This law of economics holds true in Chicago as small businesses are struggling to offset  loss of revenue from the lack of soda sales. As a result of sagging sales, employers are  cutting hours from their employees or not filling vacant positions. In total, the impact of Cook County’s beverage is tax devastating with an estimated 6,100 lost jobs, $321 million in lost wages, and $1.3 billion in lost economic activity."

Aiello added that with Cook County having to make up a $200 million shortfall, taxpayers need to be prepared to fight the next proposed tax increase.

The National Taxpayers Union was founded in 1969. For more information about our friends at NTU, click here.

October 13, 2017

A Thought about Prejudices

"Prejudices are what fools use for reason."

~ Voltaire

HT ThinkExist.

October 12, 2017

Americans Say the Sales Tax is the Fairest of Taxes

A survey of 1,000 Americans, published last month by Rasmussen Reports (tm) and conducted September 6 - 7, reported:

"Even as the fight over charging sales tax for online retailers ensues in Congress, Americans still think sales tax is the most fair type of tax they pay. But they’re nearly as likely to see income tax as both the most (and least) fair type of tax today.

"A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 39% of American Adults, when given four chief types of taxation, view a sales tax as the one that is most fair. Thirty percent (30%) rate an income tax as fairest, while eight percent (8%) feel that way about property taxes and 5% consider a payroll tax the most fair. Eighteen percent (18%) are undecided."

Sales taxes seem little more than the state version of the FairTax. For more information about the FairTax, visit the FairTax.org website.

FairTax legislation, S.18, has been sponsored in the 115th Congress (2017-2018) by Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas), and currently has four co-sponsors. In the House, Rep. Rob Woodall (R-Georgia), has sponsored FairTax legislation, H.R. 25, and currently has 45 co-sponsors.

Dan Mitchell, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, explains the flat tax in this April 2010 U.S. News & World Report article. A brief, seven-page guide to the flat tax, authored by Mitchell, is available at the Heritage Foundation.

With tax cutting and tax reform legislation about to be the major focus of Congress, Growls readers are encouraged to take a few minutes to write or call their Congressional representatives. Tell them about the Rasmussen survey, and what you think about a flat tax and/or the FairTax. Contact information is available at the Library of Congress' Congress.gov. Taxpayers living in Virginia's Arlington County can contact:

  • Senator Mark Warner (D) -- write to him or call (202) 224-2023
  • Senator Tim Kaine (D) -- write to him or call (202) 224-4024
  • Representative Don Beyer (D) -- write to him or call (202) 225-4376

And ask for a written response. And tell them ACTA sent you.

October 11, 2017

Another Thought about Patriotism

 "Our obligations to our country never cease but with our lives."

~ John Adams, letter to Benjamin Rush -- 1808

HT Founders' Quote Database, The Patriot Post.

October 10, 2017

Arlington Public Schools Pass All-Time Enrollment Record

According to the Arlington Sun Gazette's Scott McCaffrey today, "It may not be as high as school officials had projected, but Arlington’s student population has now overtaken the previous all-time record, set during the heart of the Baby Boom generation."

A few more details from his reporting include:

"Arlington Public Schools officials submitted an official 2017-18 count of 26,927 students to the Virginia Department of Education, based on the number of youngsters in class on Sept. 30.

"The official count was up 789 students – 3 percent – from a year before, and has now risen 27 percent since the 2010-11 school year.

"And it has now surpassed the previous record of 26,927 students in 1963.

"The official count, submitted annually to state officials by all of Virginia’s school districts, is “the basis for budget planning and planning for next year’s projections,” Superintendent Patrick Murphy said at the Oct. 5 School Board meeting.

"While now at a record high, the enrollment count was below what had been anticipated. “We had projected over 27,000,” Murphy said. The school system could still get there this year, as “we will ebb and flow throughout the year,” he said."

McCaffrey points out that compared to last year, "total enrollment was up 2.8 percent at the elementary-school level, 4 percent at the middle-school level and 2.6 percent at the high-school level,." Surprisingly, he wrote, "Arlington has a smaller percentage of households with school-age children, compared to surrounding jurisdictions."

He didn't mention, however, the cost of those additional 789 students. Using the FY 2017 cost-per-student of $18,957 from the most recent WABE Guide, the FY 2018 cost won't be available until later this month, the additional 789 student will cost Arlington County taxpayers almost $15 million.

Will the Arlington School Board direct the Superintendent to take immediate steps to find $15 million in cost savings to pay for the additional students? We doubt it. Growls readers with questions or comments about the year-to-year growth in enrollment can direct them to the Arlington School Board. Just click-on the link below:

  • Call the School Board office at (703) 228-6015

And tell them ACTA sent you.

October 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

The ACTA Watchdog

Latest Issue of The ACTA Watchdog




October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Items in Growls are written by individual ACTA members and do not necessarily represent the views of the Arlington County Taxpayers Association, Inc. Please send comments about Growls to The Growl Meister